SEO-Aufforderungen für Claude: Vorlagen zum Kopieren und Einfügen 2026

research tool.

TASK: Group them into topical clusters. For each cluster, suggest one 
pillar page and three supporting posts.

CONTEXT:
- Niche: [your niche, e.g. "AI SEO tools for small businesses"]
- Primary audience: [e.g. "freelance SEO consultants"]
- Existing pages we already have: [list URLs or topics, or write "none yet"]

CONSTRAINTS:
- Cluster by search intent, not just word overlap
- Flag any keywords that cannibalize each other
- Mark each cluster as informational, commercial, or transactional

OUTPUT FORMAT:
Cluster name | Pillar page title | 3 supporting posts | Intent type

KEYWORDS:
[paste your keyword list here]

this keyword before I create content.

KEYWORD: [your target keyword]

TASK:
1. Classify the intent: informational, navigational, commercial, or 
   transactional
2. Describe what the searcher is actually trying to accomplish
3. Tell me what content format Google is most likely rewarding 
   (listicle, how-to guide, comparison page, tool page, etc.)
4. List 5 related questions this searcher probably also has
5. Identify one angle that is underserved based on what typically 
   ranks for this intent

Do not give me a generic answer. Be specific about what this particular 
keyword signals.

TASK: Give me 15 keywords or questions in [industry/niche] that are 
likely to trigger featured snippets or People Also Ask boxes.

Focus on W-questions (who, what, where, when, why, how) and 
step-by-step queries.

For each keyword include:
- The search intent
- The type of featured snippet it likely triggers (paragraph, list, 
  table, steps)
- A 50-word answer optimized for that snippet format

INDUSTRY/NICHE: [your niche]
TARGET AUDIENCE: [describe your reader]

brief for the following article.

PRIMARY KEYWORD: [keyword]
SECONDARY KEYWORDS: [list 3-5 related terms]
TARGET WORD COUNT: [1,500 / 2,500 / 3,500]
TARGET AUDIENCE: [describe reader, experience level, goals, pain points]
CONTENT GOAL: [rank for keyword / capture leads / build topical authority]

INCLUDE IN THE BRIEF:
- Recommended H1 title (include keyword near the front)
- Meta description under 155 characters with a clear hook
- 6-8 H2 sections with H3 subsections where needed
- For each section: what to cover, what question it answers, 
  any data points or examples to include
- FAQ section with 5 People Also Ask-style questions
- Internal link suggestions (list pages on our site that should 
  link to this)
- What NOT to include: filler, generic intros, restatements of 
  the title

Do not write the article. Write the brief only.

TASK: Analyze the competitor content I have pasted below and identify:
1. Core NLP entities, industry terms, and semantic keywords they 
   all share
2. Specific subtopics, questions, or data points they cover that 
   my draft completely misses
3. Content angles or perspectives that are absent from all of them 
   (this is your gap opportunity)

Then give me a prioritized list of additions I should make to outrank 
these pages.

TARGET KEYWORD: [keyword]
MY DRAFT OR OUTLINE: [paste your draft or write "not started yet"]

COMPETITOR 1: [paste content or URL]
COMPETITOR 2: [paste content or URL]
COMPETITOR 3: [paste content or URL]

I want to build topical authority in [niche] and rank for 
[primary topic or keyword].

TASK: Build me a 90-day content calendar with:
- 1 pillar page (topic + recommended title + target keyword)
- 8-10 supporting cluster posts that link back to the pillar
- For each piece: target keyword, search intent, recommended 
  format, and which existing page it should internally link from

EXISTING SITE CONTENT: [list your main pages or write "starting fresh"]
AUDIENCE: [describe your reader]
GOAL: [organic traffic / lead generation / topical authority]

Prioritize topics by ranking difficulty. Start with lower-competition 
supporting posts before the pillar.

Act as an on-page SEO specialist.

TASK: Score this page out of 10 for SEO quality and give me a 
specific list of fixes ordered by ranking impact.

FOR EACH FIX INCLUDE:
- What the problem is
- Why it matters for rankings
- Exactly what to change (be specific, not general)

EVALUATE:
- Title tag and meta description
- H1, H2, H3 structure
- Keyword placement and density
- Internal linking
- Content depth and gaps
- E-E-A-T signals (author bio, expertise signals, citations)
- Schema markup presence or absence

TARGET KEYWORD: [keyword]
PAGE CONTENT: [paste full article text or HTML]

Act as a technical SEO and copywriting specialist.

I have a [type of page] targeting the keyword [your keyword].

Write:
- 5 meta title variations under 60 characters each with different 
  angles (curiosity, benefit, question, urgency, direct)
- 5 meta description variations under 155 characters each
- The recommended schema markup type for this page with a 
  brief explanation of why it helps SEO

For titles: put the keyword near the front. No clickbait. 
No punctuation at the end.
For descriptions: end each one with a soft call to action.

PAGE TYPE: [blog post / product page / landing page / category page]
TARGET KEYWORD: [keyword]
PAGE TOPIC: [brief description of what the page covers]

TASK: Rewrite the title tag and meta description for a page 
that ranks but does not get clicked.

CURRENT STATE:
- Page URL: [URL]
- Current title: [current title]
- Current meta: [current meta description]
- Target keyword: [keyword]
- Current CTR: [X]% at position [X]
- Audience: [who is searching this]

CONSTRAINTS:
- Title 60 characters or fewer, keyword near the front
- Meta 155 characters or fewer, ends with a soft call to action
- Do not imply content the page does not deliver
- Match intent: commercial or informational based on the keyword

OUTPUT:
- 5 title options ranked by predicted CTR
- 3 meta descriptions ranked by predicted CTR
- One-line reasoning for your top pick

I am running a technical audit and found these issues:
[list issues — 404 errors, redirect chains, slow page speed, 
missing canonical tags, duplicate content, crawl errors, 
missing schema, etc.]

TASK:
1. Rank these by SEO impact from highest to lowest
2. Tell me what fixing each one will achieve in terms of rankings
3. Flag anything causing immediate ranking loss right now
4. Separate into: fix this week / fix this month / fix later

SITE TYPE: [blog / ecommerce / SaaS / local business]
DOMAIN AGE: [rough estimate]
MONTHLY ORGANIC TRAFFIC: [rough estimate or "unknown"]

Act as a technical SEO specialist.

TASK: Generate valid JSON-LD schema markup for the following page.

PAGE TYPE: [FAQ page / article / product / local business / 
           how-to guide / review]
PAGE TOPIC: [describe the page]

For FAQ schema, here are my Q&A pairs:
Q: [question 1]
A: [answer 1]
Q: [question 2]
A: [answer 2]
[continue for all Q&As]

Output only the JSON-LD code block. No explanation before or after. 
No "here is your schema" prefix. Just the clean, paste-ready code.

TASK: Suggest internal link opportunities to strengthen 
this target page.

TARGET PAGE:
- URL: [URL]
- Topic: [topic]
- Why it matters: [e.g. "ranks at position 12 for a high-value keyword"]

DONOR PAGES (pages already ranking well on related topics):
[list URLs and topics for each]

CONSTRAINTS:
- Suggest anchor text that uses the target keyword or a close variant
- Anchors must read naturally, not forced
- Flag any donor page where adding the link would disrupt reading flow

OUTPUT FORMAT:
| Donor URL | Sentence to insert or modify | Suggested anchor text |

Write a [word count]-word article titled: "[title]"

TARGET KEYWORD: [keyword] — include naturally in the first 100 words 
and 2-3 headings

AUDIENCE: [describe reader — experience level, goals, pain points]

TONE: [e.g. practical and direct / conversational / authoritative]

STRUCTURE: Introduction → [number] H2 sections → FAQ section

DO NOT USE:
- "In today's digital world"
- "It's important to note"
- "In conclusion"
- Em dashes
- The words: delve, tapestry, underscore, showcase, pivotal, foster, 
  nuanced, garner

INCLUDE:
- One specific example per section
- Actionable advice the reader can use today
- At least one data point or stat

Write like you are explaining this to a colleague, not presenting 
at a conference.

for SEO content.

This introduction is too generic. Rewrite it.

RULES:
- Open with a specific fact, claim, or observation
- Do not start with "In today's..." or "When it comes to..."
- Do not warm up. Get to the point in the first sentence.
- Keep it under 100 words
- Make the reader want to keep reading

TARGET KEYWORD: [keyword]
TARGET AUDIENCE: [who is reading this]

CURRENT INTRODUCTION:
[paste your current intro]

Act as a GEO specialist focused on AI search optimization.

TASK: Review this content and tell me exactly what to change 
to make it more likely to be cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity, 
Claude, and Google AI Overviews.

EVALUATE:
- Direct answer formatting (does it answer the question in the 
  first 50 words?)
- Factual density (specific stats, named sources, verifiable claims)
- Heading structure (does each H2 match a real search question?)
- E-E-A-T signals (author expertise, citations, original data)
- Content freshness signals (dated references, old stats)

For each weakness: tell me exactly what to rewrite and how.

TARGET KEYWORD: [keyword]
CONTENT: [paste your article]

Act as an AI search visibility strategist.

TASK: Build me a 90-day entity authority plan so that AI search 
engines like Claude, Perplexity, and ChatGPT recognize my site 
as an authoritative source for [topic].

COVER:
1. On-site signals — schema markup, author byline structure, 
   content types to implement immediately
2. Content strategy — what types of content earn the most 
   AI citations
3. Off-site signals — what third-party mentions most influence 
   AI citation patterns
4. Entity consistency — how to ensure my brand appears 
   consistently across all platforms AI systems crawl
5. Month-by-month milestones to track progress

SITE/BRAND: [your site name and topic]
CURRENT STATUS: [brief description of where you are now]

Be specific. This is my roadmap, not a general overview.

Act as a link building strategist.

TASK: I am building backlinks for a [industry] website that 
publishes [type of content]. Give me 15 specific types of websites, 
publications, directories, communities, and platforms most likely 
to link to this content.

For each source include:
- Why they would link
- How to approach them
- What type of content to pitch
- Estimated link quality (high / medium / low)

MY SITE TOPIC: [topic]
MY BEST PERFORMING CONTENT: [list 2-3 URLs or titles]
COMPETITORS WHO OUTRANK ME: [list competitor domains]

Act as an SEO content analyst.

I will share the top 5 search results for [keyword]. 

Analyze them and identify:
1. Common topics and subtopics covered across all five
2. Content length and structure patterns
3. Types of evidence used (stats, examples, case studies, quotes)
4. Gaps or opportunities none of them address
5. One angle I could take that would make my version 
   worth clicking over these

KEYWORD: [keyword]
RESULT 1: [paste content or URL]
RESULT 2: [paste content or URL]
RESULT 3: [paste content or URL]
RESULT 4: [paste content or URL]
RESULT 5: [paste content or URL]